Difference between revisions of "Reconstruction:Soon To Be Dead (Dismember)"

From Conceptual Reconstructionism Project
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Music Reconstruction|file=Dismember-soon to be dead.mp3|caption=Dismember—Soon To Be Dead}}
{{Music Reconstruction|file=Dismember-soon to be dead.mp3|caption=Dismember - Soon To Be Dead}}


The introductory motif is a {{def|descent||0.3-0.7}} {{def|elevated|elevation|0.3-1.2}} to a conclusive {{def|continuation||1.2-1.9}} of {{ref|descent}}.
The introductory motif is a {{def|descent||0.3-0.7}} {{def|elevated|elevation|0.3-1.2}} 3 times, concluding in a {{def|confirmed||1.2-1.9}} {{ref|descent}}.


The next phrase shows how a {{ref|descent||2.5-5}} suffixed by a {{def|proto-{{ref|elevation}}|proto-elevation|4-6.2}} {{ref|elevates|elevation|8-10}} and then {{def|develops|develop|25-26}} its elevation iteratively.
The next phase shows how a {{ref|descent||2.5-5}} suffixed by a {{def|proto-{{ref|elevation}}|proto-elevation|4-6.2}} {{ref|elevates|elevation|8-10}} and then {{def|develops|develop|25-26}} this elevation iteratively.


Then, a tonal {{def|repetition||26.1-27}} corroborates a {{def|contained {{ref|elevation}}|contained|29-30}}.
However, a {{def|repetition||26-27.1}} is then introduced, which corroborates a {{def|contained {{ref|elevation}}|contained|29-30}} that contrasts the {{ref|development|develop}} of {{ref|elevation}}.


An {{ref|elevation||1:17.4-1:19.5}} is reintroduced, antagonized by a {{ref|repetition||1:19.5-1:21.5}} of {{ref|descent}} developing into a {{ref|continuation||}}, which becomes the {{ref|continuation||1:26.75-1:28}} of a {{ref|development|develop|1:25.5-1:26.75}}, leading to a {{ref|contained {{ref|elevation}}|contained|1:28.5-1:29.6}} {{def|repeatedly|repeated elevation|1:32.5-1:33.8}}.
An {{ref|elevation||1:17.4-1:19.5}} is then reintroduced, immediately antagonized by a {{ref|repetition||1:19.5-1:21.5}} of {{ref|descent}}. This antagonism iteratively {{ref|develops|develop|1:25.5-1:26.75}} into a {{ref|confirmation|confirmed|1:31-1:32.5}} of {{ref|descent}}, with each iteration of {{ref|descent}} {{def|leading|lead}} reactively to, first, a {{ref|contained {{ref|elevation}}|contained|1:28.5-1:29.6}} and, then, a {{def|repeating {{ref|elevation}}|repeating elevation|1:32.5-1:33.6}}.


Finally, the introductory {{ref|continuation}} motif is evolved into an {{ref|elevation||1:34-1:35.8}} of a {{def|{{ref|developed|develop}} {{ref|repetition}}|developed repetition|1:35.3-1:36.5}} subbing {{ref|continuation}}, projecting the {{ref|{{ref|repeated}} {{ref|contained {{ref|elevation}}|contained}}|repeated elevation|1:32.5-1:33.8}} alluded to by the subbed {{ref|continuation}}.
The final motif is an evolution of the introductory motif into an {{ref|elevation||1:34-1:35.8}} of a condensed {{def|projection||1:35.3-1:36.5}} of the {{ref|repeating {{ref|elevation}}|repeating elevation|1:32.5-1:33.6}}, thwarting the expectation (set by the introductory motif) of a {{ref|descent}} {{ref|confirmation|confirmed}} which had become, implicitly since the preceding section, the {{ref|leading|lead}} motif of this projection.

Latest revision as of 18:38, 13 January 2022

You are reading a reconstruction.

Quick guide (IMPORTANT): please read our quick reading guide.

Spoiler note: we advocate a “spoilers don’t matter” stance. Read more about it.

Copyright note: we do NOT generally own the rights to the reconstructed content. Reproduction is made under the provisions of fair use for educational purposes.

For more info on reconstructions, we refer you to our manifesto or the online book.


The introductory motif is a <descent>DEF <elevated>DEF 3 times, concluding in a <confirmed>DEF <descent>.

The next phase shows how a <descent> suffixed by a <proto-<elevation>>DEF <elevates> and then <develops>DEF this elevation iteratively.

However, a <repetition>DEF is then introduced, which corroborates a <contained <elevation>>DEF that contrasts the <development> of <elevation>.

An <elevation> is then reintroduced, immediately antagonized by a <repetition> of <descent>. This antagonism iteratively <develops> into a <confirmation> of <descent>, with each iteration of <descent> <leading>DEF reactively to, first, a <contained <elevation>> and, then, a <repeating <elevation>>DEF.

The final motif is an evolution of the introductory motif into an <elevation> of a condensed <projection>DEF of the <repeating <elevation>>, thwarting the expectation (set by the introductory motif) of a <descent> <confirmation> which had become, implicitly since the preceding section, the <leading> motif of this projection.