You are reading a reconstruction.
Quick guide (IMPORTANT): please read our quick reading guide.
Spoiler note: we advocate a “spoilers don’t matter” stance. Read more about it.
Copyright note: we do NOT generally own the rights to the reconstructed content. Reproduction is made under the provisions of fair use for educational purposes.
For more info on reconstructions, we refer you to our manifesto or the online book.
From the start, an <elevation>DEF is repeatedly pulled down at its <apex>DEF by descending intervals, first <abruptly>DEF, then after a <staggered>DEF descent.
A new concept is then introduced when <tremolo>DEF is used to prefix <elevation>. This tremolo <causes>DEF a descending <transposition>DEF of <elevation>. It <propagates>DEF to the <apex> of a <transposed> <elevation>, leading to a <<tremolo> transposition>DEF.
The composition then correlates <<staggered> descents>DEF to a <<staggered> <elevation>>DEF as a decomposition of <elevation> into <proto-<elevations>>DEF. The <staggering> is progressively <assimilated>DEF, by analogy, into a descending <<tremolo> <transposition>>, where the tremolo abstracts the <staggered> segments.
In contrast to the preceding essentially descending section, the final section starts with a <<staggered> <elevation>> based on a <rhythmically>DEF repeating <proto-<elevation>>. Then, in total contrast, the final motif starts with a <<tremolo> <transposition>> that pulls down the preceding <elevation>, and then correlates a <<transposed> <tremolo>>DEF to a <proto-<elevation>>. The final motif thus produces an epiphany that reveals simultaneously (a) the <proto-<elevation>> semantics that <tremolo> implicitly acquired when it <assimilated> the <<staggered> <elevation>>, and (b) an appropriation of the preceding <<staggered> <elevation>>, as the final motif’s cadence reveals a <rhythmic> alignment.
